A tweet by a Twitter user on 6th October 2022 claimed that m_Gurush, a mobile money platform in South Sudan charges clients for cash deposits.
“I heard mGurush charges for cash deposit. A messed up strategy in every aspect,” the tweet reads.
The tweet got attention of tweeps including a tweet reply that seems to confirm that claim.
“Non agents do charge ones when depositing money, but m_Gurush main outlets DO NOT charge on deposit,” a tweep said in a tweet reply.
We contacted both an mGurush agent and client to know their experience when depositing.
Lucky Charles, owner of Jami General Trading and Investment Company Limited and an agent for mGurush, tells 211 Check that clients are not charged when depositing money into their mGurush wallets over a private line, but mGurush charges when withdrawing cash.
Lucky Charles said, “For us as agents,when we sent money to private line,we are not charged and they can not charged the private line,unless the private line wanted to withdraw money.’’
Caesar Lemi, a mGurush client, stated that he deposited money into his account yesterday without incurring any fees.
‘’ Even yesterday, I deposited money to my mGurush account without any charges,’’ Lemi told 211 Check
He told 211 Check that this claim is false, but mGurush agents tell him that they do not have money when he normally wants to withdraw cash.
mGurush replies
“No, we do not charge for cash deposits,” mGurush said in a reply to 211 Check when asked via messenger.
“Please report any agent who charges for deposit. We have tariff guides displayed and also our service charges are shown on your confirmation screen when withdrawing,” it said on Twitter.
Conclusion:
211 Check finds the claim that mGurush charges for cash deposits false.
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/mGurush-False.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-11 13:48:082022-10-11 13:48:10Fact-check: Does mGurush charge clients for deposits? No, it doesn’t
A WhatsApp link purporting to be the “Sweden Sponsorship Visa and Job Portal” for an opportunity for Sweden visa sponsorship jobs is false.
The claim encourages international applicants to apply for visa sponsorship jobs in Sweden in 2023. And it employs two distinct links, each of which leads to the same form used to collect personal information, which is a phishing scam.
The claim employs a predatory strategy to entice victims to complete the application processes as quickly as possible by stating that “the number of applicants is limited….continue.”
And conditions that applicants share with five WhatsApp groups or fifteen WhatsApp friends before being directed to the visa form webpage, with the promise of receiving a confirmation email within 24 hours.
But, is this call legitimate? 211 Check takes a look into it here:
The page has spelling and grammar errors which are unusual of an official site. Besides, the website has only a single page and lacks pages like “About Us” or “Contact Us”
The official website for candidates interested in working in the European is EURES, a European cooperation network of employment services, designed to facilitate the free movement of workers. The network has always worked hard to ensure that European citizens can benefit from the same opportunities, despite language barriers, cultural differences, bureaucratic challenges, diverse employment laws and a lack of recognition of educational certificates across Europe.
Opportunities Corners is also a legitimate broad & wide opportunities discovery platform for youth all around the world. They recently published an article about seven Swedish based companies that are sponsoring visas for foreign workers which among them include; Assa Abloy, Ericsson, H&M, IKEA, Spotify, Google Sweden, and Apple Sweden. The link is here
Conclusion:
Scammers are exploiting people online by mirroring or impersonating the original opportunities under false pretense. Their goal is to gather personal information such as people’s contacts, emails, addresses, and country of origin.
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Sweden-Jobs-Phising-Scam.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-06 16:03:012022-10-06 16:03:04Fact-check: This is a phishing scam
A Facebook post advertisement run by a page called “Application Date” in the media/news company category about the United Nations Volunteer Program 2022, a fully funded international volunteer program, encouraging people to apply, is false.
Since September 5, 2022, the post has received over 3,400 interactions, 1,800 comments, and 140 comments.
Is it necessary for a United Nations Volunteer Program applicant to communicate with the “Application Date” Facebook page in order to apply? No, and here is why:
When one clicks apply for jobs on the page, it takes them to a messenger chat box with the page, where they receive a suspicious message saying, “Congratulations! …..you have qualified to apply for a job in Canada or the United States, please apply using the link provided.”
They then provide a link to Nguniversities.com, which claims to be an educational website established with the goal of providing quality and reliable information about every institution and scholarship opportunities; however, it is not the official website for the UN Volunteers Program.
While it is true that opportunities for the UN Volunteers program exist, the procedures with which the Application Date Facebook page advertises and directs the applicants is false.
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/FALSE-UNV-PROGRAM.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-04 15:28:052022-10-04 15:28:07Fact-check: This is not the way to apply for the UN Volunteer Program
A claim that has been making the rounds on WhatsApp groups that Ecobank’s National Government Subsidies campaign is offering internet users the chance to win up to 100,000 South Sudanese Pounds (SSP) after correctly answering four questions, is a hoax.
“Do you know Ecobank?” one of the questions asks. “What age are you?” “What are your thoughts on Ecobank?” “Also, are you male or female?”
Despite being warned that the link is a phishing scam, several users have continued to share it in WhatsApp groups and with their contacts. This is a phishing scam, in which people pose as trustworthy companies or organizations in order to obtain personal information from victims.
After answering all of the questions, one is supposedly eligible to win prizes, but it then instructs people to share with five groups or twenty WhatsApp friends as conditions before claiming the prize, which is supposed to arrive within five to seven days, according to the claim.
These links, however, are phishing scams. An investigation by 211 Check discovered that the claim is a scam from an entity or individual who is not the real Ecobank Group, and you should not click or interact with them.
A search on Google and the Ecobank Group website for National Government Subsidies yielded the result “No match found.”
According to publicly available information on the Ecobank Group’s website, the website where the claim about the Ecobank offer is posted does not match with the true website features of the Ecobank Group. The official Ecobank website is: https://ecobank.com/.
211 Check concludes that there is no offer of such kind going on with the Ecobank Group.
The links being shared are scams. You should not click or interact with them. This sort of scam is called a phishing scam, which is where people pretend to be trustworthy companies or organisations in order to get personal information from victims.
Criminals use publicly available information about you online (including social media sites) to make their phishing messages more convincing.
You can reduce your chances of being phished by considering what personal information you (and others) post about yourself, as well as reviewing your privacy settings on your social media accounts.
Recognising a scam
It might be a scam if:
it seems too good to be true – for example, a holiday that’s much cheaper than you’d expect
someone you don’t know contacts you unexpectedly
you suspect you’re not dealing with a real company – for example, if there’s no postal address
you’ve been asked to transfer money quickly
you’ve been asked to pay in an unusual way – for example, by Mobile Money or through a transfer service like MoneyGram or Western Union
you’ve been asked to give away personal information like passwords or PINs
you haven’t had written confirmation of what’s been agreed
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Ecobank-phising-scam.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-04 09:12:312022-10-04 09:12:33Fact-check: Is Ecobank offering 100,000 pounds for free? No, it is a scam and should not be interacted with
A Facebook post published by Sixty 4 Tribes Press claiming that dozens of South Sudanese were injured during a community association election petition in Kenya is false.
“Dozens were injured during the Warrap State Community Association election petition in Kenya after one of the candidates was cornered by goons hired by an embassy official,” partly reads the post shared on Monday, 3rd October 2022.
The Facebook post was also followed with a lot of hashtags which is a red flag for potential disinformation campaign.
The article as put by the page.
An official at the Embassy of South Sudan in Nairobi dismissed the news as false. He said there was no Warrap Community Association election held around the time of the report.
211 Check finds the Facebook post claiming that dozens South Sudanese were injured during a community association election petition in Kenya false. The Embassy of South Sudan in Nairobi dismissed the news as false and the image used in the post is of unrelated event in 2017.
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/FALSE-2.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-03 19:38:012022-10-03 19:38:04Fact-check: Photo showing an incident involving South Sudanese in Kenya? No
A similar article alleging a Zambian woman has been in circulation since 2016.
Writer: Ghai Aketch
An article going viral depicting that a South Sudanese woman, 42-year-old, allegedly identified as Ajak and her son, Abel, said to have been engaging in sexual intercourse every Wednesday at their residence in the Netherlands according to maintain riches, is false.
“A 52-year-old South Sudanese woman identified as Ajak who is living in Netherland, has openly confessed to having sexual intercourse with her son in order to maintain his riches,” partly reads the claim that has been recycled since 2020.
It has been shared in several posts here, here, here, and here on Facebook.
The East African Vibe website published this claim on September 27, 2022. But the same claim had earlier been shared several times by tabloids in 2020, including South Sudanese’s like the South Sudan News Agency.
But, did a South Sudanese woman actually confess having sexual intercourse with son to maintain riches?
We discovered that the first article was edited from: “A 52-year-old Zambian woman identified as Banda Yvonne, has openly confessed to having sexual intercourse with her son in order to maintain their hard-earned riches…” to “A 42-year-old South Sudanese woman identified as Ajak has…”
Conclusion:
The claim that a South Sudanese woman in the Netherlands confessed having sexual intercourse with her son to maintain riches is false as the story has been fabricated and doesn’t reflect real characters. A similar article alleging a Zambian woman has been in circulation since 2016.
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/South-Sudanese-Woman.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-03 19:04:562022-10-03 19:04:58Fact-check: South Sudanese woman did not confess having sexual intercourse with son to maintain riches
A Facebook post shared by a user on 30 September 2022 with the caption “No comments.” that appears to show a signpost with the inscription “Juba City Council” is false.
Nearly 50 people interacted with the photo, which received 18 comments and six shares. Some Facebook users, such as this one, also reposted it.
But does this photograph have anything to do with Juba or South Sudan? We double-check it:
A reverse image search yields results for the alleged signpost, which has been a long-running internet meme with trends on Facebook and Twitter. The original post does not specify a location, but it has recently been photoshopped to imply that it is in Juba.
The photograph first appeared on this Indian website on Wednesday, December 19, 2018, with no caption. Byta FM Zambia, a Facebook page in the Radio station category, posted it in September 2019 with the caption “Keep your environment clean.”
The same signpost photo was also posted here and here.
Conclusion:
The photograph with the inscription “Juba City Council” has been altered. The original photo, which was first shared on an Indian website in December 2018, does not have such writing.
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Juba-City-Council-Misleading.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-02 17:55:442022-10-02 17:55:47Fact-check: Photo showing a signpost with a “Juba City Council” inscription? No, it is edited
South Sudan Broadcasting Corporation (SSBC), a state-owned broadcaster, announced on Saturday, October 1, 2022, on its Facebook page that the speaker of the Revitalised Transitional Government of National Unity (R-TGoNU) reshuffled a list of elected members of parliament to the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) who were elected on Friday, September 30, 2022, citing an incomplete document.
Screenshot of SSBC News Facebook post deleted moments later
The document from the Speaker’s office was used to formally announce the results of all candidates, including those who lost. The announcement follows the original list of verified candidates. On the original list of verified candidates, each candidate was assigned a number.
The successful candidates were announced, and the Revitalized Transitional National Legislature confirmed the election of nine MPs to represent the country at the East African Legislative Assembly, or EALA, late on Friday.
On the same day, the clerk of the assembly listed finalists in a letter to the Secretary General of the East African Community.
Conclusion:
211 Check considers the SSBC news post, which was later deleted, misleading. The news outlet cited an incomplete document.
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/MISLEADING-SSBC.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-01 17:42:402022-10-01 17:42:42Fact-check: This incomplete document is not the official list of winners for the East African Legislative Assembly seats
The video footage is from an unrelated event in December 2021.
Writer: Emmanuel Bida
According to video footage circulating on social media and first published by a Facebook user, the wife of a South Sudanese minister was apprehended at Khartoum International Airport with millions of dollars in UN boxes today. This is false because it is an old video.
The post received over 100 interactions, including more than 50 shares and several comments.
“It is not surprising that the Minister’s wife was caught red-handed officially by Sudan Intelligence Security Agencies traveling from South Sudan with millions of dollars in boxes and has been arrested at the Khartoum International Airport (KIA) in Sudan with about $ 20 million USD in boxes marked UN,” partly reads the post that was re-shared by African press and Juba South Sudan, Facebook pages that are known for sharing false and misleading content recently.
Some social media users also shared the same video with the claim here and here.
A claim that money was impounded from a minister’s wife in Khartoum, Sudan, is found to be false by 211 Check. The video is from a separate event in December 2021.
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/FALSE-1.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-01 15:50:412022-10-01 15:50:44Fact-check: Money impounded from a minister’s wife in Khartoum, Sudan? No, it is an old video
There were no babies born with anencephaly in their department on September 18, 2022, according to a member of the surgical team at Juba Teaching Hospital. He also stated that the images that are going around do not accurately depict the Juba Teaching Hospital’s obstetrics and gynecology theater.
By Beatrice Amude
Aweil Eye, a Facebook page with over 6,000 followers claimed in a post on September 18, 2022 that a mother from South Sudan had given birth to an “old man” in Juba Teaching Hospital that day.
The claim was later widely shared on Facebook; here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here as well as in encrypted messaging platforms like WhatsApp.
But is it true that such a baby was born at Juba Teaching Hospital? 211 Check explores its research finding here:
Dr. Francis Geri a Gynecologist at Vital Care Medical and also works at Juba Teaching Hospital said that the picture was not taken in South Sudan.
He, however, described the abnormality as Anencephaly. According to him, Anencephaly is when a newborn with absence of a major portion of the brain, skull and scalp occurs during embryonic development. Geri told 211 Check that the main cause of the anencephaly is folic acid deficiency.
In the comments section of the same post, Riemon Koyani, who was among the surgical team at Juba Teaching Hospital on Sunday 18th September, 2022 said he did not see any baby with anencephaly in their department that day.
“I am among the surgical team of Sunday and I didn’t see anything like this in our department, in fact I attended all the cesarean sections that day and I never saw anything of that kind,” Riemon Koyani said.
He also confirmed that the pictures circulating were not taken from Juba Teaching Hospital since they do not match obstetrics and gynecology theater views.
211 Check finds pictures allegedly of a woman who gave birth to an “old man” at Juba Teaching Hospital false. Riemon Koyani, who was among the surgical team at Juba Teaching Hospital on Sunday 18th September, 2022 said there was no baby with anencephaly in their department that day.
https://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/JTH-FALSE.png788940211 Checkhttps://211check.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/211Check_logo-1-300x120.png211 Check2022-10-01 10:58:212022-10-01 10:58:24Fact-check: Was this baby born at Juba Teaching Hospital? No
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
Privacy Policy
You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.