Tag Archive for: #FactsMatter

Fact-check: South Sudanese woman did not confess having sexual intercourse with son to maintain riches

A similar article alleging a Zambian woman has been in circulation since 2016.

Writer: Ghai Aketch 

An article going viral depicting that a South Sudanese woman, 42-year-old, allegedly identified as Ajak and her son, Abel, said to have been engaging in sexual intercourse every Wednesday at their residence in the Netherlands according to maintain riches, is false. 

A 52-year-old South Sudanese woman identified as Ajak who is living in Netherland, has openly confessed to having sexual intercourse with her son in order to maintain his riches,” partly reads the claim that has been recycled since 2020. 

It has been shared in several posts here, here, here, and here on Facebook.

Screenshot of the false article

The East African Vibe website published this claim on September 27, 2022. But the same claim had earlier been shared several times by tabloids in 2020, including South Sudanese’s like the South Sudan News Agency.  

But, did a South Sudanese woman actually confess having sexual intercourse with son to maintain riches?

Internet searches by 211 Check found out that the article is false, for the original article was shared in August 2016 by the Igboho Connect News, the Nigerian Daily Post and also appeared on Nairaland Forum in August 2016. Several tabloids have since reshared the same article in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

Original article that first appeared in August 2016

We discovered that the first  article was edited from: “A 52-year-old Zambian woman identified as Banda Yvonne, has openly confessed to having sexual intercourse with her son in order to maintain their hard-earned riches…” to “A 42-year-old South Sudanese woman identified as Ajak has…” 

Conclusion:

The claim that a South Sudanese woman in the Netherlands confessed having sexual intercourse with her son to maintain riches is false as the story has been fabricated and doesn’t reflect real characters. A similar article alleging a Zambian woman has been in circulation since 2016.

Explainer: What is the difference between a Nationality Certificate and a National ID in South Sudan?

Writer: Emmanuel Bida Thomas

  Courtesy photo of a National ID     
                           Courtesy photo of a Nationality Certificate

South Sudanese have recently sought clarification on the distinction between the Nationality Certificate and the National ID, both of which are issued by the Directorate of Civil Registry, Nationality, Passports, and Immigration.

211 Check attempts to explain the differences between the two documents in the categories of definition, guiding laws, issuing authority, and validity in this short article.

Definitions: 

A “Nationality Certificate” is the document granted to a South Sudanese National who is eligible for national status in accordance with the provisions of Chapter III of the Nationality Act, 2011.

A “National ID” is a document issued to every South Sudanese of at least eighteen years of age for purposes of employment or as required by a “competent authority.”

Guiding laws:

The “Nationality Certificate” is issued in accordance with the provisions of the South Sudan Nationality Act, 2011.

National ID” is issued in accordance with the provisions of the South Sudan Civil Registry Act, 2018.

Issuing authority:

The “Nationality Certificate” is processed at the Directorate of Nationality, Passports and Immigration and issued/signed by the Minister of Interior.

National ID” is processed at the Directorate of Civil Registry and issued/signed by the Director of Nationality and Passports.

Validity:

The “Nationality Certificate” has a lifetime validity and it does not expire.

National ID” has a five-year validity and expires just like a passport.

References:

To read more about the Nationality Certificate and National ID, kindly refer to:

The South Sudan Nationality Act, 2011

The South Sudan Civil Registry Act, 2018

Fact-check: Photo showing a signpost with a “Juba City Council” inscription? No, it is edited

Writer: Emmanuel Bida Thomas

A Facebook post shared by a user on 30 September 2022 with the caption “No comments.” that appears to show a signpost with the inscription “Juba City Council” is false.

Nearly 50 people interacted with the photo, which received 18 comments and six shares. Some Facebook users, such as this one, also reposted it.

But does this photograph have anything to do with Juba or South Sudan? We double-check it:

Screenshot of misleading signpost

A reverse image search yields results for the alleged signpost, which has been a long-running internet meme with trends on Facebook and Twitter. The original post does not specify a location, but it has recently been photoshopped to imply that it is in Juba.

The photograph first appeared on this Indian website on Wednesday, December 19, 2018, with no caption. Byta FM Zambia, a Facebook page in the Radio station category, posted it in September 2019 with the caption “Keep your environment clean.”

The same signpost photo was also posted here and here.

Original photo without “Juba city Council” writing

Conclusion:

The photograph with the inscription “Juba City Council” has been altered. The original photo, which was first shared on an Indian website in December 2018, does not have such writing.

Fact-check: This incomplete document is not the official list of winners for the East African Legislative Assembly seats 

Writer: Emmanuel Bida Thomas

South Sudan Broadcasting Corporation (SSBC), a state-owned broadcaster, announced on Saturday, October 1, 2022, on its Facebook page that the speaker of the Revitalised Transitional Government of National Unity (R-TGoNU) reshuffled a list of elected members of parliament to the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA) who were elected on Friday, September 30, 2022, citing an incomplete document.

The post was deleted moments later.

Screenshot of SSBC News Facebook post deleted moments later

Incomplete document cited by SSBC News

The document from the Speaker’s office was used to formally announce the results of all candidates, including those who lost. The announcement follows the original list of verified candidates. On the original list of verified candidates, each candidate was assigned a number.

Document showing original list of candidates

Election result for the 26 candidates as displayed on the assembly’s projector screen

The successful candidates were announced, and the Revitalized Transitional National Legislature confirmed the election of nine MPs to represent the country at the East African Legislative Assembly, or EALA, late on Friday.

On the same day, the clerk of the assembly listed finalists in a letter to the Secretary General of the East African Community.

Finalists in a letter addressed to the Secretary General of the East African Community

Conclusion:

211 Check considers the SSBC news post, which was later deleted, misleading. The news outlet cited an incomplete document.

Fact-check: Money impounded from a minister’s wife in Khartoum, Sudan? No, it is an old video

The video footage is from an unrelated event in December 2021.

Writer: Emmanuel Bida

According to video footage circulating on social media and first published by a Facebook user, the wife of a South Sudanese minister was apprehended at Khartoum International Airport with millions of dollars in UN boxes today. This is false because it is an old video.

The post received over 100 interactions, including more than 50 shares and several comments.

It is not surprising that the Minister’s wife was caught red-handed officially by Sudan Intelligence Security Agencies traveling from South Sudan with millions of dollars in boxes and has been arrested at the Khartoum International Airport (KIA) in Sudan with about $ 20 million USD in boxes marked UN,” partly reads the post that was re-shared by African press and Juba South Sudan, Facebook pages that are known for sharing false and misleading content recently.

Some social media users also shared the same video with the claim here and here.

Screenshot of the false video footage

The video, however, is quite old. A Facebook search returns versions of the same video from December 2021, claiming that $300 million in smuggled money from Sudan to South Sudan was seized at Juba International Airport. It was also used in connection with an allegation that more than $300 million USD was confiscated at Juba International Airport in December 2021.

Conclusion:

A claim that money was impounded from a minister’s wife in Khartoum, Sudan, is found to be false by 211 Check. The video is from a separate event in December 2021.

Fact-check: Was this baby born at Juba Teaching Hospital? No

There were no babies born with anencephaly in their department on September 18, 2022, according to a member of the surgical team at Juba Teaching Hospital. He also stated that the images that are going around do not accurately depict the Juba Teaching Hospital’s obstetrics and gynecology theater.

By Beatrice Amude

Aweil Eye, a Facebook page with over 6,000 followers claimed in a post on September 18, 2022 that a mother from South Sudan had given birth to an “old man” in Juba Teaching Hospital that day.

The claim was later widely shared on Facebook; here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here as well as in encrypted messaging platforms like WhatsApp.

Screenshot of the false post by Aweil Eye

But is it true that such a baby was born at Juba Teaching Hospital? 211 Check explores its research finding here:

Reverse image search on Google returns results of the same pictures allegedly of a woman who gave birth to a mysterious child at the Makeni Regional Hospital Northern Province of Sierra Leone, but no credible media reported on the same.

More results of the Google image search seem to show the same pictures used on Twitter long before these reports, but could not link to the original tweets.

Dr. Francis Geri a Gynecologist at Vital Care Medical and also works at Juba Teaching Hospital said that the picture was not taken in South Sudan.

He, however, described the abnormality as Anencephaly. According to him, Anencephaly is when a newborn with absence of a major portion of the brain, skull and scalp occurs during embryonic development. Geri told 211 Check that the main cause of the anencephaly is folic acid deficiency.

In the comments section of the same post, Riemon Koyani, who was among the surgical team at Juba Teaching Hospital on Sunday 18th September, 2022 said he did not see any baby with anencephaly in their department that day.

I am among the surgical team of Sunday and I didn’t see anything like this in our department, in fact I attended all the cesarean sections that day and I never saw anything of that kind,” Riemon Koyani said.

He also confirmed that the pictures circulating were not taken from Juba Teaching Hospital since they do not match obstetrics and gynecology theater views.

What is Anencephaly?

Anencephaly is the absence of a major portion of the brain, skull, and scalp that occurs during embryonic development. It is a cephalic disorder that results from a neural tube defect that occurs when the rostral (head) end of the neural tube fails to close, usually between the 23rd and 26th day following conception.

Conclusion:

211 Check finds pictures allegedly of a woman who gave birth to an “old man” at Juba Teaching Hospital false. Riemon Koyani, who was among the surgical team at Juba Teaching Hospital on Sunday 18th September, 2022 said there was no baby with anencephaly in their department that day. 

Fact-check: Suspected Ebola case in Nimule? True 

The suspected case was identified in Nimule, Eastern Equatoria State, with similar Ebola signs. However, it’s only the laboratory test that will confirm whether he has the Ebola virus or not, according to health authorities.

By Jibi Moses


A message widely shared on WhatsApp on September 28, 2022, claimed that a suspected case of Ebola was reported in the border town of Nimule at 3 PM that day.

The claim was also viral on Facebook, as can be seen here.

I got a call at 3pm from Nimule about an alert case of a South Sudanese, male who was coming from Morobi camp in Moyo district, spent some short time in Miligo adjumani District till the morning of that day.He was identified vomiting blod, had difficulty in breathing, had high fever, coughing and with yellow eyes as per the medical team in Nimule,” the WhatsApp message reads.

Nimule Hospital medical director Silvesto Nyumba told Radio Tamazuj that samples from the suspect, who is now in isolation, were taken to Juba for investigations, and the results are expected today, Friday.

Screenshot of the viral WhatsApp message 

When contacted by 211 Check, Kabaka Quintuous Leone, a journalist who widely reports on Eastern Equatoria State confirmed that the claim of the suspected case is true and that the suspect was put in isolation after his samples were taken to Juba for analysis.

Public urged to observe safety measures to avoid Ebola virus:

The Minister of Health, Yolanda Awel Deng, called on the public, especially travellers to embrace safety measures by regularly washing hands and other sanitary measures to avoid contracting the Ebola virus, according to a report by Eye Radio.

What is Ebola Virus Disease?

Ebola virus disease (EVD) is a deadly disease with occasional outbreaks that occur mostly on the African continent. EVD most commonly affects people and nonhuman primates (such as monkeys, gorillas, and chimpanzees). It is caused by an infection with a group of viruses within the genus Ebolavirus.

Read more about the Ebola virus disease on the websites for the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Conclusion:

The claim that there is a suspected Ebola case alert is true. The suspected case was identified in Nimule, Eastern Equatoria State, with similar Ebola signs. However, it’s only the laboratory test that will confirm whether he has the Ebola virus or not, according to health authorities.

Fact-check: Is soursop very effective in killing cancer? This claim is unproven

Cancer Research UK does not support the use of Graviola to treat cancer. Their advice is to be very cautious about believing information or paying for any type of alternative cancer therapy on the internet because they say claims that Graviola can treat cancer are not backed up by research.

By Jibi Moses

Claims across the internet suggest that soursop, a species of the genus Annona of the custard apple tree family, Annonaceae, which has edible fruit is 10,000 times more effective in killing cancer than chemotherapy.

The claim asserts that this is based on cancer research conducted in the United Kingdom, but no authoritative source is cited.

The image with the claim that is being shared online

What is soursop?

According to an article by Rachael Link, on an online platform named Healthline titled: Soursop (Graviola): Health benefits and Uses on October 06, 2017, Soursop also known as Graviola is the fruit of Amona Muricata, a type of free native to tropical regions of the Americas and some parts in Africa.

The prickly green fruit has a creamy texture and a strong flavor that is often compared to pineapple or strawberry.  It is typically eaten raw by cutting the fruit into half and scooping out the flesh although in some parts of the world it can be made into chocolate, ice cream and tea.

A typical serving of this fruit is low in calories yet high in several nutrients like fiber and vitamin C. It also contains a small amount of niacin, riboflavin folate and iron.

Interestly many parts of the tree are medicinal including the leaves stem and fruits. It is also used in cooking and can be applied on the skin.

High in Antioxidants 

Many of the reported benefits of Soursop are due to its high content of Antioxidants. Antioxidants are compounds that help neutralize harmful compounds called free radicals which can cause damage to cells. Some research shows that the Antioxidants could play a role in reducing the risks of several diseases including heart diseases, cancer and diabetes.

It may kill cancer cells.

Although most research currently is limited to test tubes and studies, some studies have found that Soursop could potentially help eliminate cancer cells. One test tube study treated breast cancer cells with Soursop extracts. Interestly enough, it was able to reduce tumor size, kill off cancer cells and enhance activity of the immune system.  Another study looked at the effects of Soursop extract on leukemia cells, which was found to stop growth and formation of cancer cells. However,  keep in mind that these test tube studies lolog at a strong dose of soursop extracts. Further studies need to look at how eating the fruit may affect cancer in humans.

Other health benefits are: it may help in fighting bacteria,  may help reduce inflammation and in helping to stabilize sugar levels. Many online sites have much information about Soursop and its benefits and these among others are: Wikipedia, Dr.Axe,WebMD, All recipes, medical news today, natural food series 

An image of the fruit in its earlier stage on the tree

A ripe Soursop

Sliced pieces of a ripe Soursop 

What do experts say about soursop?

211 Check contacted a medical expert in Juba, to give their expert views on what they know about the fruit medically, but he “couldn’t give clear explanation citing lack of medical evidence.”

Another health expert at the University of Juba told 211 Check that “due to the fact that the fruit is an antioxidant, it helps neutralise harmful cancer cells.”

An explainer by AFP Fact Check in 2020 stated that scientists say there is insufficient evidence to prove soursop work as a natural health cure.

While research suggests soursop can fight cancer, it has not been studied in humans. As a result, there is no evidence of its safety or efficacy,” the non-profit Cancer Treatment Centers of America states in this article published on July 13, 2017.

The Cancer Research UK charity also states in an article here that “There is not enough reliable evidence that graviola works as a treatment for cancer.” Cancer Research UK does not support the use of graviola to treat cancer. Their advice is to be very cautious about believing information or paying for any type of alternative cancer therapy on the internet.

FDA Warns Against Soursop (Graviola):

In April 2017, the Food and Drug Association (FDA) sent out warning letters to 14 companies, advising them to change or remove the fraudulent claims regarding Graviola on their websites. The FDA forwarded warning letters to all companies selling/distributing Graviola because unsubstantiated claims are made that Graviola can cure cancer.

What is Chemotherapy?

According to Wikipedia, chemotherapy often abbreviated as Chemo, CTX or CTx, is a type of cancer treatment that uses one or more anticancer drugs (chemotherapeutic agents) as part of a standardized chemotherapy regimen. Chemotherapy may be given with a curative intent or it may aim to prolong life or reduce symptoms.  It is one of the major categories of the medical disciplines specifically devoted to pharmacotherapy for cancer which is called medical oncology. The term chemotherapy has come to connote nonspecific usage of intracellular poisons to inhibit mitosis (cell division) or induce DNA damage which is why inhibition of DNA repair can augment chemotherapy.

According to Mayo clinic, chemotherapy is a drug treatment that uses powerful chemicals to kill fast-growing cells in your body. It is most often used to treat cancer since cancer cells grow and multiply more quickly than most cells in the body. However, they went ahead to explain that it’s better for other conditions like bone marrow diseases and immune system disorders.  They further elaborated more on the risks and side effects of the therapy both immediate and long lasting. 

Many medical websites have elaborate information about chemotherapy and some of them are here, here, here and here.

Conclusion:

211 Check finds the claim that Soursop is 10,000 more effective than chemotherapy unproven; it is not verifiable based on available research and scientific evidence. 211 Check believes that individuals who intend to use Soursop in any form should consult with their treating physician first.

Fact-check: Has the UN issued an alert on organ trafficking? No, it’s fake

This alert is not available on the official website of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. The United Nations denies having issued it.

By Ochaya Jackson

A United Nations document alerting the public on organ trafficking in the Middle East countries on social media is not true. 

The document indicated that the black market for human body parts in Middle East is in high demand, and warned the public of fake jobs offer abroad in which they murder the victims and remove organs from their bodies to be sold in the black market.

The black market for parts of the human body is booming in  the Middle East. A kidney now costs 262,000 dollars (131 million CFA Francs); the heart costs 119,000 dollars (60 million CFA Francs) and liver costs 157,000 dollars (79 million CFA Francs). Beware of the fake foreign agencies promising to make you work abroad. They process your paper, pay your plane ticket, and just take you abroad pretending they want to find you a job, but instead, they kill their victims, recover all the precious parts of their bodies”, the document reads.

The document bears the claimed link to the website of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

When one clicks on the link claimed in the document, it returns an error message “the page or document requested is not available”.

Additionally, there is no any related document alerting about organ trafficking on the UN office on drugs and crime website.

A fact-check by PesaCheck in March 2021 on the same document found out that the alert was false.

Furthermore, the archived statement on organ trafficking on the website of UNODC covering from 2017 until August 2022 said that the need for transplantation of healthy organs into those who have failed organs have increased as such illicit means are being used to harvest human organs.

Screenshot of archived webpage

On March 10, 2021, UNODC Pakistan spokesperson Rizwana Asad told AFP that the claim was false and not shared by the UN.

AFP Fact-check states that the purported alert was first published on Facebook on March 2, 2021.

211 Check investigated an alleged United Nations alert warning the public about organ trafficking in the Middle East and discovered it to be FALSE.

Fact-check: Yes, the Bank of South Sudan has ordered commercial banks to freeze accounts of Silicone Valley South Sudan Co. Limited

The directive by the Bank of South Sudan for commercial banks to block and freeze accounts of Silicone Valley South Sudan Co. Limited is true. The Bank of South Sudan confirmed that the viral letter is its official document.

By Ochaya Jackson

The Bank of South Sudan has directed the blocking and freezing of accounts for Silicone Valley South Sudan Co. Limited that claims it is affiliated to Silicone Valley Shares, in all the commercial banks in South Sudan.

The bank’s decision according to the document that went viral on social media, is that the Silicone Valley South Sudan Co. Limited is under investigation on compliance issues with the laws of South Sudan.

The Bank of South Sudan (BOSS) top management would like to inform you that Silicon Valley Co. Ltd is still under investigation on issues related to compliance with all the relevant laws of South Sudan. Therefore, you are hereby directed to block and freeze the bank accounts of Silicon Valley Co. Ltd until further notice,” reads in part the document dated 23rd of September, 2022 signed by the bank’s director of supervision department, Deng Aru Bol and addressed to managing directors of all commercial banks in South Sudan.

Bank of South Sudan letter that went viral on social media

The Bank of South Sudan confirmed the authenticity of the document and said they are the official and authentic source  when contacted by 211 Check.

What do commercial banks say?

The Equity Bank of South Sudan said it has not yet received “the official instruction from the central bank”, but confirmed that it had “already blocked the account of Silicon Valley when the rumors” about their business came out.

Ecobank, where most of the company’s bank wire is done and Co-operative Bank South Sudan could not immediately respond to our inquiries.

What does 211 Check know about Silicone Valley South Sudan Co. Limited?

Silicone Valley Shares claims to be a venture capital firm with more than $6.4 billion in assets under management that invests early in founders building fast-growing technology companies.

The firm says it is a Limited Liability Company (LLC) headquartered in San Jose, California. Silicone Valley Shares also claims to have helped launch and commercialise 200-plus companies since 2010, including investments in DocuSign, Jet.com, Kiva Systems, LinkedIn, Rapid7, SurveyMonkey, Taleo, and TellApart.

It entered the South Sudan Market and registered at the registrar of companies in the ministry of Justice in December 2021 as “Silicone Valley South Sudan Co. Limited.” 

According to news reports by Eye Radio and the Sudans Post, hundreds of South Sudanese, including those who have invested thousands of dollars in the company, are worried about its legitimacy and legality in the United States, though the South Sudan Police Service says the company is legally registered with the government.

mGurush Partnership:

In this blog post on its website, Silicone Valley Shares states that its clients shall be accessing its services using MGurush, South Sudan’s pioneer mobile money platform that provides a fast, easy, safe and convenient way to send and receive money across the country.

However, in a tweet reply, mGurush said it was unaware of Silicone Valley Shares and that they were not in partnership.

Freezing of Silicone Valley Shares Bank Accounts:

On September 23, 2022, the Central Bank of South Sudan directed all commercial banks operating in the country to block and freeze all accounts of Silicone Valley South Sudan Co. Limited

211 Check is still undertaking indepth research into Silicone Valley Shares and will publish its findings at a later date.

Conclusion:

211 Check has found that the directive by the Bank of South Sudan for commercial banks to block and freeze accounts of Silicone Valley South Sudan Co. Limited is true. The Bank of South Sudan confirmed that the viral letter is its official document.