Tag Archive for: #SouthSudan

211 Check Website Graphic Feature Image

Fact-check: No, South Sudan has not expelled U.S. Ambassador Michael Adler

/in , , ,

The Ministry of ICT and Postal Services, in a statement, termed the claim as untrue and urged the public to treat it as negative propaganda.

Writer: Makur Majeng

A viral Facebook post claiming that South Sudan has ordered U.S. Ambassador Michael Adler to leave the country within 72 hours is false. There is no official confirmation from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the U.S. Embassy – Juba, or any credible news source to support the claim.

The Facebook post alleges that South Sudan, through its Ministry of Foreign Affairs and government spokesperson Michael Makuei Lueth, ordered Ambassador Adler to leave the country following diplomatic tensions and visa denials for government officials. It further claims that relations deteriorated after the U.S. imposed new sanctions on Vice President Benjamin Bol Mel.

However, 211 Check has verified that there is no official expulsion order or diplomatic directive that has been issued against Ambassador Adler. Neither the Ministry of Foreign Affairs nor the U.S. Embassy in Juba has confirmed any such development.

Screenshot of viral Facebook post shared on April 21, 2025, falsely claimed the U.S. Ambassador was expelled from South Sudan. 

Claim Verification:

The U.S. Embassy in Juba remains operational and has not announced any disruption in its activities.

The Ministry of Information, Communication, Technology and Postal Services issued a statement today debunking the claim as untrue and negative propaganda.

The Sudan Post also stated that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs dismissed the claim on April 12th, 2025. 

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the Republic of South Sudan wishes to address recent misinformation circulating on social media regarding the status of diplomatic relations with the United States,” Ayuel said in a media briefing.

“Contrary to these unfounded claims, the Government of the Republic of South Sudan has neither expelled the United States Ambassador nor closed its Embassy in Washington, D.C,” she added.

Context

The fabricated post appears to exploit diplomatic tensions between South Sudan and the United States over visa restrictions that Washington imposed on all South Sudanese citizens, including government officials. 

Conclusion

211 Check found that the claim stating the U.S. Ambassador to South Sudan was ordered to leave the country is false and misleading. No credible evidence supports the expulsion claim, and both governments continue to maintain diplomatic ties.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.

211 Check Website Graphic Feature

Explainer: U.S. visa suspension on South Sudan: what happened, who’s affected, and what’s next?

/in , ,

Writer: Makur Majeng

A visa is an official document, typically a sticker or stamp in a passport, issued by a country’s government that grants a foreign national permission to enter, stay in, or leave that country for a specific purpose and duration. 

It’s essentially a conditional authorisation for entry, not a guarantee of it, and is subject to border control upon arrival. 

Common types of visas include tourism, work and employment, study and education. humanitarian or refugee resettlement and diplomatic or government missions.

Why are visas important?

Visas are important because they allow countries to control who enters and stays within their borders, helping to regulate immigration, manage security risks, and enforce immigration laws. They ensure that visitors meet the required entry criteria and are visiting for the intended purpose, be it tourism, work, or study, and uphold diplomatic reciprocity among nations under international law.

Without a valid visa, travellers may face denial of entry, deportation, and loss of access to legal protections.

Why U.S. suspending visas for South Sudanese citizens?

Early on 5th April 2025, the United States suspended visa services for citizens of South Sudan. U.S. officials accused South Sudan’s government of failing to accept its repatriated citizens, violating long-standing immigration protocols. 

“I am taking actions to revoke all visas held by South Sudanese passport holders and to restrict any further issuance to prevent entry into the United States, effective immediately,” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio tweeted on April 5th, 2025.

Context:

The crisis centered on a man deported from the U.S. to South Sudan. South Sudanese authorities initially denied him entry, claiming he was not South Sudanese but Congolese, despite the U.S. possessing legal travel documents for Makula Kintu, who was certified by the South Sudan embassy in Washington.

“South Sudan’s own embassy in Washington certified this particular individual as one of their nationals. We cannot have a repatriation system that allows foreign governments to reopen eligibility after certification,” U.S. Deputy Secretary Christopher tweeted on April 7, 2025.

However, the South Sudan government later on agreed to allow Makula Kintu’s entry into the country while maintaining that he was not South Sudanese but a national of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

“The Government of the Republic of South Sudan has decided to grant Mr. Makula Kintu permission to enter the country,” reads part of the South Sudan Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ statement released April 8, 2025.

Who is affected by the U.S. visa suspension?

The U.S. suspension affects all South Sudanese citizens, whether they are students seeking education in U.S. universities, business professionals, workers, entrepreneurs, government officials, humanitarian workers, or asylum seekers.

Why does this matter?

This dispute highlights how visa restrictions are increasingly used as tools of foreign policy and migration control, with ordinary citizens often caught in the middle.

Experts warn that such suspensions risk escalating diplomatic tension and disrupting education and career plans, isolating diaspora communities, and worsening humanitarian and economic conditions in South Sudan.

What violations can lead to visa revocation?

Under U.S. law, visas can be revoked for national security or criminal concerns, human rights violations by the home government, fraud or misrepresentation in visa applications, and violation of U.S. immigration laws.

What is the solution? 

Having diplomatic engagement and negotiations with the U.S. government will help improve coordination on immigration and deportation procedures as well as de-escalate diplomatic tension between the two countries.

Conclusion: 

While the U.S. visa suspension sends a strong diplomatic message, its unintended consequences threaten to punish ordinary South Sudanese citizens, particularly youth, who bear no responsibility for political disputes.

For many young South Sudanese, U.S. visas are critical for accessing education, professional development, and global opportunities.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.

211 Check Website Graphic Feature

Explainer: New US tariffs hit South Sudan: What you need to know

/in , ,

Writer: Makur Majeng

The United States has announced new tariffs on goods imported from several African countries, including South Sudan. A 10% tariff will now apply to goods coming from South Sudan into the U.S., as part of a broader move by President Donald Trump to impose “reciprocal tariffs” globally.

This explainer breaks down what tariffs are, why they matter, and how they could impact South Sudan and the wider East African region.

What is a tariff?

A tariff is a tax imposed by a government on goods imported from other countries. Tariffs make imported products more expensive, aiming to encourage consumers to buy local alternatives or to protect domestic industries from foreign competition.

Why is the U.S. imposing new tariffs?

The 2025 tariffs are part of Trump’s push for “reciprocal tariffs” — arguing that U.S. goods face higher taxes abroad and that America should respond similarly. A full list published by The Guardian shows new tariffs applied on countries including China (34%), Vietnam (46%), India (26%), and South Africa (30%). However, the U.S paused tariffs for other countries to allow room for negotiation, but increased tariffs on goods from China by 125% after the Chinese government retaliated by imposing 84% on American goods.

For African nations, the tariffs are framed as a response to “currency manipulation, trade barriers, and unfair competition” — although many experts say the measures could hurt developing economies more than they help U.S. industry.

How does this impact South Sudan?

South Sudan is only a minor trade partner for the United States. According to the United States Trade Representative (USTR), in 2024, the total U.S. goods traded with South Sudan was $60.1 million. The U.S. goods exports to South Sudan were $59.3 million, a 16.9% increase from 2023. 

However, U.S. goods imports from South Sudan were just $0.8 million, though this rose 165.3% from 2023, and the U.S. had a $58.5 million trade surplus with South Sudan in 2024.

Because South Sudan’s exports to the U.S. are very small, the direct financial impact of the new 10% tariff will likely be limited. However, the broader signal — that African countries are not exempt from global tariff wars — could discourage future trade growth.

Additionally, if U.S. businesses importing goods like raw materials or specialty products from South Sudan pass on the extra costs to consumers, South Sudanese exporters could face difficulties maintaining competitiveness.

Although the dollar amounts are modest, the tariff could discourage future trade growth. For example, if a South Sudanese leather handbag used to sell in the US for $100, it will now cost $110 after the 10% tariff, making it harder to compete with products from countries without such taxes. 

Local products like oil and gum arabic, looking to expand exports, may now face higher barriers to entry into the American markets.

Which other East African countries are affected?

South Sudan is not alone, but other affected East African countries include the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Kenya, Ethiopia, Uganda, Djibouti, and Eritrea. Each faces new tariff rates ranging from 10% to 30%, depending on the product category.

Is there a remedy for the tariff?

Countries impacted by tariffs have several options:

  • Negotiate bilateral trade deals with the U.S. to seek exemptions or reductions.
  • Diversify export markets beyond the U.S. to reduce reliance.
  • Invest in value-added production, which could offset tariff costs by exporting finished goods rather than raw materials.

For South Sudan, which is still building its trade capacity post-independence, regional partnerships and improving its ease of doing business could be key strategies.

Looking ahead

While the immediate economic hit to South Sudan might be small, the broader risk is reduced access to the U.S. markets in the future. As global trade becomes increasingly protectionist, smaller economies like South Sudan must prepare for a more competitive and challenging international trade environment.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.

211 Check Website Graphic

Fact-check: No SSPDF general committed suicide in Rumbek, South Sudan.

/in , , ,

The photo has been online since March 2024, and it originated in Kenya, with media reports indicating it is of a Kenyan teacher who committed suicide after he lost 900,000 Kenyan shillings in gambling. No SSPDF general committed suicide in Rumbek.

Writer: Makur Majeng

A photo shared in a post by Phow Radio FM, a Facebook page, claiming the South Sudan People’s Defense Force (SSPDF) general has committed suicide in Rumbek is false.

“This morning, full confirmed report, an SSPDF senior officer, Gen. Bol Mawien Agany, has reportedly taken his life by hanging outside Rumbek town. His family narrates to Phow Radio FM that, “It was yesterday at 9PM once our father got a call from the top leadership in Juba, assuring him to immediately report himself to Bilpam to lead the new forces to hotspot Nasir under the control of White Army. “This morning, we thought our father went to town, but unfortunately found hanging on the nearby tree,” reads the false claim.

The screenshot of the Facebook post

Rumbek is the state capital of Lakes State in South Sudan.

Claim Verification

Upon investigation, it was found that the claim made by Phow Radio FM is false. Our research indicates that the photo shared by the page was not captured in South Sudan. Instead, it was used in multiple Kenyan media reports about an unrelated suicide case.

A simple Google reverse image search revealed that the same image was posted by multiple Kenyan news outlets, including:

Mt Elgon Online TV Kenya: “Shock as JS teacher in Keiyo North commits suicide after losing Ksh 900,000 to aviator betting moments after taking a bank loan.”

Bomet Newspaper: “Shock as JS teacher in Keiyo North commits suicide after losing Ksh 900,000 to aviator betting moments after taking a bank loan.”

This confirms that the photo is unrelated to any event in South Sudan and was misused to spread false information.

Additionally, there is no public official statement made by the South Sudan People’s Defence (SSPDF) concerning the alleged suicide committed by the SSPDF general. 

On the other hand, local sources in Rumbek have also confirmed that no such incident happened.

“We have tried to consult, but there is no such news around Rumbek here today,” said the Good News Radio station director, Raphael Makuei, after he was contacted by 211 Check.

Conclusion

211 Check has found the claim in a post by Phow Radio FM, claiming the SSPDF general hanged himself with a rope on a tree as suicide in Rumbek to be false. The photo shared was taken in Kenya and has been widely circulated in Kenyan media. There is no credible evidence to support the claim made by Phow Radio FM.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.

211 Check Website Graphics

Explainer: Ebola outbreak in Uganda, what it means for South Sudan, and how to stay safe.

/in , ,

Writer: Makur Majeng

Uganda’s Ministry of Health, in its report on 30 January 2025, confirmed a new outbreak of Ebola in the capital, Kampala, with one fatality recorded. The patient in question was a 32-year-old male nurse who displayed great internal bleeding and multiple organ failure, which included high fever, chest pain, and most importantly, difficulty in breathing before he succumbed to death at Mulago Hospital. 

Ugandan health investigators have established close contact tracing of 44 people, including 30 healthcare workers among them. The outbreak of the Sudan Ebola virus is concerning because there is no approved vaccine for the variant.

This is not the first time Uganda has experienced an Ebola outbreak, but it has been on and off since the early 2000s and recently.

Sudan Ebola Virus image; Source: Africa CDC

Because of its proximity to Uganda and the frequent movement of people between the two countries, there is concern about the containment of any further cross-border transmission of the disease by the authorities in South Sudan.

This article further looks at what Ebola is, how it originated, how it is prevented, and the actions the Ministry of Health in South Sudan has taken to counter the virus before reaching the country.

What is the Ebola virus?

It is an acute infectious, deadly illness that affects humans and non-human primates that is caused by one of the members of the family of Filoviridae, ebolavirus. The Ebola class, as a hemorrhagic fever, means great internal bleeding, lots of exterior skin bleeding, organ failure, and in many cases triggers death.

There are six strains of the Ebola virus acknowledged, four other forms of which can cause an infection in monkeys:

  • Zaire ebolavirus (the deadliest and most common due to vaccines),
  • Sudan ebolavirus ( SUDV) (the one which caused the outbreak in Uganda: There is no vaccine currently approved. ),
  • Bundibugyo ebolavirus,
  • Taï Forest ebolavirus.
  • Reston ebolavirus (affects non-humans but does not participate in the epidemic among human beings).
  • Bombali ebolavirus (is found in bats; there are yet no officially known cases of people infected).

Ebola is commonly spread through direct contact with any of the bodily fluids of an infected person: blood, saliva, urine, vomit, sweat, faeces, breast milk, or semen. Contaminated surfaces and any piece of contaminated medical equipment also allow transmission; hence, the tendency to be a high-risk area.

How Did Ebola Come About?

In 1976, the first recorded outbreak of Ebola occurred in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) near the Ebola River, from where it gets its name. The virus is thought to have originated from fruit bats, which serve as natural hosts. Ebola is a zoonotic disease, meaning it is transmitted from animals to humans, typically through contact with already infected animals such as chimpanzees, monkeys, gorillas, or becoming infected through bushmeat.

The Ebola outbreak occurred mainly in Central and West Africa, which has seen serious outbreaks in the DRC, Uganda, Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia.

What are the Ebola symptoms?

As stated by the WHO, Ebola symptoms occur between 2 and 21 days after infection and worsen rapidly. Among the key symptoms are:

  • Early Symptoms (Flu-like):
  • High fever (higher than 38.5°C)
  • Severe headache
  • Muscle pain and general weakness
  • Sore throat
  • Advanced Symptoms:
  • Vomiting and diarrhoea
  • Rash and red eyes
  • Uncontrolled bleeding from the body (internal and external)
  • Failure of organ systems and multi-organ collapse

Are There Any Preventive Measures?

According to the UK Health Security Agency, there is no licensed vaccine for the Sudan ebolavirus, but preventive measures may include:

  • Avoid direct contact with infected individuals or animals.
  • Practice proper hand hygiene; wash hands with soap and water or disinfect them using a hand sanitiser.
  • Wear a protective suit and masks when treating patients in high-risk areas.
  • Avoid bushmeat, which carries the potential to transmit the virus.
  • Thoroughly disinfect areas contaminated with bodily fluids of an infected person.

What is South Sudan’s Ministry of Health Response?

After the Ugandan government’s confirmation of a Sudan ebolavirus outbreak in Kampala, Uganda’s government notified the South Sudan Ministry of Health about the outbreak. In response, the health ministry announced surveillance measures at major points of entry, with enhanced screening procedures for incoming travellers at Juba International Airport and the Nimule border and more intensified monitoring of individuals entering from Uganda.

With the rampant border movement between South Sudan and Uganda, the country is at a greater risk of virus transmission, according to Dr. Kediende Chong, Director General for Preventive Health Services and Emergency Response, as quoted by Eye Radio. 

Dr. Chong emphasised that these measures were necessary due to the movement of people between the two countries, which heightens the risk of the Ebola virus entering South Sudan.

Among the measures, citizens are urged to be vigilant and to report any suspected cases of Ebola to the nearest health facility, and early detection and isolation can prevent the spread of the virus.

Conclusion:

Ebola’s outbreak in Uganda poses serious public health challenges for bordering countries like South Sudan, although Ebola has not yet been reported in South Sudan. However, prevention is key to stopping the spread of the deadly virus and the Ministry of Health has announced enhancing border surveillance, public awareness, and health facility preparedness to protect the citizens.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.

211 Check Website Graphics

Fact-check: A viral video of the protest with the caption President Kiir must go is old, not recent.

/in , , ,

There was no protest today, and the video does not depict a protest against the social media ban but rather a 2021 demonstration for justice after musician Trisha Cee was knocked down in a water tanker accident.

Writer: Makur Majeng

A viral video making rounds on social media claims to show South Sudanese youths protesting in Juba against President Salva Kiir’s rule. The protesters are allegedly demanding that the president face prosecution by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for crimes against humanity. However, this claim is false, and the video has been altered to mislead viewers.

“The social media blockade has sparked street protests in some parts of South Sudan, with youth calling for President Kiir to step down and face the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity. The country’s National Communication Authority, acting on orders from the ruling party, SPLM, has banned access to Facebook and TikTok across the country since last night. (File Footage)” reads Facebook Post. 

The screenshot of Garang John’s post.

Claim Verification: 

The video is not recent, and a Google reverse search reveals that the footage originally appeared on March 30th, 2021, during a protest unrelated to politics or the ICC.

The 2021 demonstration occurred after the tragic death of South Sudanese musician Trisha Cee, who was knocked off a boda-boda in a road accident involving a water tanker driven by an Eritrean. The protesters gathered at the Mobil Roundabout in Juba to demand improved healthcare services, stricter road safety regulations, and justice for Trisha Cee.

After a fatal road accident involving a water tanker, protesters called for better healthcare infrastructure and stricter licensing rules for foreign drivers, particularly Eritreans, as posted by Eye Radio.

Activists like Wani Michael, Manasseh Mathiang, and James Kolok were among those arrested during the protest. Demonstrators carried signs demanding justice for Trisha Cee, better road safety measures, and healthcare reforms.

Context:

The viral video has been manipulated with altered captions, and audio voices chanting “Kiir Must Go” in the background were taken from an old video protest about food and hunger by the students of the University of Bahr el Gazal in May 2024.

Social media users recirculated the video with misleading captions to stir political tension, but the fact remains clear the protests were about road safety and healthcare, not opposition to President Kiir.

Conclusion:

211 Check established that the viral video claiming that South Sudanese youth protested against President Kiir is false and misleading. The footage was extracted from a 2021 video that relates to demands for road safety and healthcare reforms following the death of musician Trisha Cee.

There was no protest today at the mobile roundabout regarding any issue against the president or the government.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.

211 Check Website Graphics

Fact-check: No, the government is not recording WhatsApp calls as well as reading messages.

/in , ,

WhatsApp’s viral claim about government surveillance is false. No evidence suggests WhatsApp is monitored in South Sudan; its encryption ensures privacy.

Writer: Makur Majeng

A viral WhatsApp message circulating in South Sudanese WhatsApp groups claiming that new communication rules would allow the government to monitor WhatsApp messages and calls is false. 

The message also included threats of arrest and prosecution for sharing content critical of the government or on sensitive topics while warning that devices are automatically connected to a government ministry system for monitoring.

Screenshot of the WhatsApp claim

In addition to that, it also claimed that WhatsApp has new rules for group members with different colours of ticks when messages are sent or read, warned users to avoid sharing “bad posts,” and advised WhatsApp group moderators to monitor their group content.

Screenshot of the claim

Claim Verification:

This is not a new claim, a Google keyword search showed that similar messages had been circulating globally since at least 2021. The same text, sometimes with minor variations, has appeared in countries like India, Nigeria, and Kenya, often sparking unnecessary alarm among users.

Other Facebook links are available here, here and here.

There has been no official announcement from WhatsApp or any government in South Sudan about effecting such measures. WhatsApp, owned by Meta, uses end-to-end encryption, which ensures that only the sender and receiver can read messages or access calls. Not even WhatsApp itself can intercept or monitor messages, let alone third parties like governments.

This claim has been debunked by various fact-checking organisations, including Fact Crescendo, NewsChecker and NewsMeter, in their previous investigations as false. 

211 Check also found an Africa Check fact-check, titled “No, WhatsApp is still fully encrypted,” published on their website in 2022. 

“This is false, all messages on WhatsApp are end-to-end encrypted, meaning only the sender or the receiver can see or hear your messages, nobody else. Not even WhatsApp,” Africa Check quoted a WhatsApp official as saying at that time.

Conclusion

211 Check found earlier evidence which valid that the viral WhatsApp message is false and part of a recycling hoax that has been going on for a long.

The claim did not originate in South Sudan but from other countries around the world as part of misinformation which was debunked.

Neither the government of South Sudan nor other countries publicly announced such a move on recording WhatsApp calls and reading messages on the platform.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.

211 Check Graphic Image

Fact-check: Did Donald Trump say everyone in South Sudan is a thief, including civilians?

/in , ,

Global figures like Donald Trump are often subject to fabricated or misattributed quotes online. This is likely one of those cases, with no factual backing.

Writer: Makur Majeng

A recent Facebook post by South Sudanese musician John Frog claims that U.S. President Donald Trump once said, “Everyone is a thief in South Sudan, including civilians.” is false.

The post, which includes the hashtag #GG and a laughing emoji, has sparked curiosity and mixed reactions online. John Frog’s post gained rapid engagement, garnering 160 likes, 60 comments, and one share within five minutes.

“President Donald Trump said everyone is a thief in South Sudan including civilians, what does he mean ?#GG,” reads John Frog’s post.

The screenshot of John Frog’s Facebook post.

Claim Verification:

A Google keyword search using the “Donald Trump everyone is a thief in South Sudan statement” shows no related information.

211 Check conducted a comprehensive review of Donald Trump’s speeches, interviews, and social media accounts like Facebook, and X(formerly Twitter) and revealed no record of him making such a statement about South Sudan. Searches across credible news organizations like CNN and BBC and public records yielded no results.

If Trump had made such a controversial remark, it would have been widely covered by both South Sudanese and international media. However, no credible outlet has reported this claim.

The playful tone of the post, paired with the hashtag #GG and the laughing emoji, suggests it may be satirical or humorous rather than factual. Such exaggerations are common on social media to spark engagement or provoke discussion.

Global figures like Donald Trump are often subject to fabricated or misattributed quotes online. This is likely one of those cases, with no factual backing.

Conclusion:

211 Check has verified that the claim about Donald Trump stating that “Everyone in South Sudan is a thief, including civilians” is false. There is no evidence to support this statement, and it is likely a humorous or satirical comment rather than a factual assertion.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.

211 Check Website Graphics

Fact-check: Donald Trump is not offering a $200 grant to Africans

/in ,

Authentic grant applications or financial assistance programs do not demand users to share promotional links on social media to proceed.

Writer: Makur Majeng

A viral message circulating on WhatsApp groups claiming that U.S. President-elect, Donald Trump is offering a $200 cash grant to Africans, is false. This claim is part of an online scam to deceive users and potentially compromise their personal information.

“Donald Trump donates $200 Grant each to everyone in all African countries as he becomes the president of America for the second time,” reads the fraudulent message 

Screenshot of the WhatsApp message

Upon clicking the provided link, users are shown a pop-up message with instructions to withdraw the grant cash.

“SMS: Congratulations You are qualify for President Trump $200 CASH GRANT FOR AFRICANS. Kindly Press OK to Withdraw Cash Prize”.

Screenshot of the pop-up message

Users are then prompted to answer questions such as, Is Donald Trump a good president? Choose your gender. Select your age group.

Screenshots of the questions

After answering the questions, users are instructed to share the link with five WhatsApp groups or 15 friends before proceeding to the final submission page.

Screenshots of the web page interface

Claim Verification:

A Google keyword search using terms like “Donald Trump $200 grant for Africans” reveals no credible results or related news articles. No announcements or information from reputable sources validate this claim.

Legitimate grant offers or financial aid programs associated with public figures or governments are typically announced via formal channels such as official press releases, established news outlets, or verified social media accounts.

A Whois domain lookup for the link provided indicates that it was registered recently, on February 25, 2024, and is set to expire on February 25, 2025. The domain is not affiliated with Donald Trump or any credible organization associated with him.

Screenshot of the Whois domain analysis

Trump who won the U.S. presidential election recently, has no announcement on all his official social media platforms regarding a $200 grant for each African. 

Analysis:

A VirusTotal scan of the URL confirms that the website poses potential security risks, including redirecting users to phishing pages. These sites may prompt users to download malicious software, complete fake surveys, or enter personal information that can be exploited for identity theft.

The requirement for applicants to share the link with multiple WhatsApp contacts or groups is a classic scam technique. This tactic spreads the fraudulent link quickly and widely, creating a false sense of legitimacy yet it is not.

Authentic grant applications or financial assistance programs do not demand users to share promotional links on social media to proceed.

Conclusion:

211 Check has verified that the claim about Donald Trump offering a $200 grant to everyone in all African countries is a hoax. This is part of a scam campaign aimed at collecting personal information, defrauding victims,  and possibly installing malicious software on users’ devices.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.

211 Check Website Graphics

Explainer: Why cyber threats and scams remain a challenge in South Sudan?

/in , , ,

Misinformation and disinformation have been weaponised as tools to build trust and to create convincing narratives in phishing email messages or inbox alerts that influence users to accept or take action, whether by revealing their sensitive information.

Writer: Makur Majeng

As the digital space in South Sudan evolved, it has opened the door to cyber threats and scams from social media platforms and other online channels. The digital space continues to be the biggest driver of information dissemination among human populations, powered by both internet and mobile telecommunications penetration in the country.

Facebook and WhatsApp are widely used means of communication for a great majority. However, these platforms have become grounds for numerous cyber threats and scams—a real danger to users. 

Cyber threats are malicious acts that seek to damage data, steal data, or disrupt digital systems. It is normally perpetrated by individuals, criminal organisations, state actors, and terrorist organisations to achieve specific objectives.

Social media scams are suspicious activities by individuals who create fake profiles or pages and unexpectedly contact users on social media to gain their trust and manipulate them. A social media scammer pretends to be a friend, family member, or anybody with specific interests. 

On the other hand, they impersonate real business entities, employers, the government, and investment or online trading platforms.

This explainer provides an analysis to understand why such threats continue in South Sudan’s social media space.

Cyber Threats and Scams

According to a joint advisory issued by SafetyComm and 211 Check, in September this year, there are different categories of cyber scams rampant in South Sudan.

There have been false alarms where users receive notification messages directly in their inbox or email claiming to be sent from Meta or Facebook about page verification, violations of community standards, and copyright infringement. 

Some of these messages contain threats of account deletion or suspension and demand users to click malicious links within the next few hours. The intention is to entice the users to click malicious links that may lead to the compromise of their accounts.

In addition to that, a phishing attack has been used to acquire personal information such as usernames, passwords, and credit card details. The attack weaponised malicious links embedded into the false alarm notification messages by those masquerading as trustworthy individuals or entities.  

These cyber threats and scam operations involve social engineering techniques by cybercriminals seeking to manipulate victims into providing their confidential data. 

This method involves using lures to obtain clicks, masquerading as known entities or contacts to entice the victim into providing confidential data like passwords, and clicking on a malicious link embedded within job advertisements, promotions, fake giveaways, or investment schemes.

In the last five years, SafetyComm recorded a total of 854 compromised social media accounts between 2021 and 2024. Most of the cyber threats and scams take place on the Facebook platform, which amounts to 57.3%, with WhatsApp (22.8%) and Instagram (18.9%), as documented by the SafetyComm.

The dangers that come after being comprised is that confidential data not meant for the public will get its way into the hands of unauthorised persons, leading to identity theft, data loss, and, in the worst-case scenario, unauthorised access to private materials like nudes. 

Common Cyber Scams 

Scammers send messages with claims that a user’s profile has met the requirements for a verified badge from Meta, and then users are asked to click shady links within 24 hours before it expires. Users received false alerts that they had violated Meta’s Community Standards by allegedly using fake photos or distributing misleading content and directing users to request a review through a malicious link.

Also, scammers threaten users that their accounts have violated copyright infringement and will be deleted if users fail to repeal the incident through a dubious link. 

So why are cyber scams still rampant in South Sudan?

Many social media users do not have the necessary basic cyber security knowledge and tools to detect and prevent deceptive messages or fraudulent activities.  This makes them vulnerable to clicking on malicious email links without a second thought as to whom the link is coming from, as well as reacting to providing confidential personal data when asked by impersonators. 

There are no strong mechanisms now to enforce cyber laws due to a lack of legal basis and expertise by law enforcement agencies in prosecuting various cyber fraud schemes. The Cybercrime and Computer Misuse Bill is still in parliament for deliberations. This shortcoming has empowered cybercriminals to perpetrate deadly operations against online users in the country. 

The Role of Misinformation and Disinformation

Misinformation and disinformation have been weaponised as tools to build trust and to create convincing narratives in phishing email messages or inbox alerts that influence users to accept or take action, whether by revealing their sensitive information like passwords, credit card numbers, and personal details or by doing what the message has urged them to do.

In this context, by spreading false or misleading information, attackers and scammers exploit online users’ emotions in terms of fear and curiosity to lure them in by clicking on malicious links or providing confidential data.

Conclusion:

The digital landscape in South Sudan has significantly remained vulnerable to cyber threats and scams. This is due to a lack of strengthened information technology infrastructure and a lack of digital literacy skills among online users, which leaves them vulnerable to social engineering tactics employed by cybercriminals.

The absence of enforceable cyber laws has created an environment where perpetrators operate with relative impunity, exploiting loopholes and targeting unsuspecting users on platforms like Facebook and WhatsApp.

To overcome these threats, there is a need to improve cybersecurity infrastructure and enhance digital literacy to empower the public on how to detect and avoid cyber scams. Besides, the national parliament should fast-track the enactment of the Cybercrime and Computer Misuse law to set the stage for enforcement to protect online users.

To ensure accuracy and transparency, we at 211 Check welcome corrections from our readers. If you spot an error in this article, please request a correction using this form. Our team will review your request and make the necessary corrections immediately, if any.

It’s vital to fight misinformation and disinformation in the media by avoiding fake news. Don’t share content you’re uncertain about. False information can harm and mislead people, risking their lives—Fact-check before sharing.  For more details, visit https://211check.org/, or message us on WhatsApp at +211 921 350 435. #FactsMatter.