Misinformation that is purposely created to spread fear, cause panic, and has the potential to cause individual or communal harm.

Fact-check: These shoes (Tex Hazel) weren’t found in South Sudan

The shoes were invented and used by a cattle thief named Crazy Tex Hazel in 1920 for stealing cows and are currently kept in the Northeastern Nevada Museum in Nevada, USA.

Writer: Jibi Moses 

Suncity Tv, a local blog in South Sudan, posted on the 11th of March, 2023, a story with pictures of homemade wood and leather shoes with a design of two pairs of cow hooves on each, allegedly found in some village in South Sudan, but this claim is false. 

The page with over 7,000 followers describes itself as a Society and Culture website on a mission to change the negative narrative of South Sudan, promoting all the 64 tribes in South Sudan by showcasing their culture and lifestyles and sharing myriads of success stories to keep you inspired had captioned the shoes, “These shoes were found in some village in South Sudan (village name hidden). A cattle thief designed and used it to hide his footprint while on duty.’’

A screenshot of the post by Suncity TV.

Investigation:

On running a Google Reverse Image Search on the picture, several results were brought on the internet 211 check found that the same pictures were first used in 2021 by a Facebook page named Bentiu Tv and Agogo Ayo, a blog named 9GAG, further still the same pictures were posted on Reddit. 

Some sites that previously used this picture can be found here, here, and here. All these pages and blogs clearly explain that these shoes were used by a man called Crazy Tex Hazelwood. He was a notorious cattle thief in America in the year 1920.

In the 1920s, one small-time thief named Crazy Tex Hazelwood made a pair of ingenious boots so he would not get caught stealing cattle from his neighbours. This pair of “boots” look like slippers attached to two cow hooves on each slipper.

These shoes are currently in the Northeast Nevada Museum in Nevada, USA.

Conclusion:

211 Check finds that claim that the shoes in the picture were found in a South Sudanese village is false. The shoes are not found anywhere in South Sudan but were used in the US by a notorious cattle thief  Crazy Tex Hazel. The shoes are kept in the Northeastern Nevada Museum but not in South Sudan.

Fight misinformation in mainstream and alternative media by not being a victim of fake news. Refrain from sharing content you are unsure about or don’t know where it comes from to prevent spreading false information. For more information on our fact-checking process, visit https://211check.org/ or send us a WhatsApp message at +211 917 298 255 to present a claim. Our team will fact-check it and respond promptly. #FactsMatter

Fact-check: Did Pope Francis say celibacy can be revised? Yes, he did

He did, during a celebration ceremony of his tenth Papal year. When asked by Infobae whether celibacy could be revised, Francis answered that it could. He added that Celibacy in the Western Church is a “temporary prescription… It is not eternal like priestly ordination.”

Writer: Jibi Moses

A blog post by suncitytvsouthsudan claims Pope Francis said celibacy could be revised. “In a new interview, Pope Francis discussed the possibility of revising the Western discipline of celibacy. Priestly celibacy…” the blog post says in part.

A similar post was published on Phoenix news: “Pope Francis says Catholic Church banning priests from engaging in sex is ‘temporary.”

Screenshot of a post by suncity 

The post is seen on Phoenix. 

Searches on Bing and Google return many results confirming the claim’s accuracy. Pope Francis was in defence of saying that celibacy is a temporary prescription.

“When asked by Infobae whether celibacy could be revised, Francis answered that it could. He added that Celibacy in the Western Church is a “temporary prescription… It is not eternal like priestly ordination,”  a caption from an article reads.

Some of the explanations can be found here, here, and here. In addition to the articles, there are some videos too 1, 2, 3. The Fox News Channel clarified that the church banning clerics from sex is ‘Temporal’.

So, what is celibacy?

Clerical celibacy is the requirement in certain religions that some or all clergy members be unmarried. Clerical celibacy also requires abstention from deliberately indulging in sexual thoughts and behaviour outside of marriage because these impulses are considered sinful. The practice has been in the catholic for almost over 1000 years. According to Wikipedia, it was made a prerequisite for one to take a religious role. And it was started by the forefathers in the church. According to Quora, celibacy was introduced by Gregory the Great.

In 1322 Pope John XXII insisted that no one bound in marriage—even if unconsummated—could be ordained unless there was full knowledge of the requirements of Church law. If the free consent of the wife had not been obtained, the husband, even if already ordained, was to be reunited with his wife, the exercise of his ministry being barred. Accordingly, the assumption that a wife might not want to give up her marital rights may have been one of the factors contributing to the eventual universal practice in the Latin Church of ordaining only unmarried men.

Despite all the Clergy suggestions about celibacy and marriage, when asked whether the practice would draw more people into the church, He replied that he didn’t think so because there have been priests with wives and children, especially in the East.  

There has always been a lot of controversy around priests and keeping this command which they take as an oath before God to serve Him diligently. The Church has been grappling with it, with some cases reported and sorted while many remain in the dark, as seen here, here, and here.

Conclusion:

Yes, it is true that Pope Francis, during an interview marking his tenth year of  Papal journey,  was recorded saying that celibacy can be revised because it’s temporary. Similarly, he said the Church denying priests sex is equally temporary.

Fight misinformation in mainstream and alternative media by not being a victim of fake news. Refrain from sharing content you are unsure about or don’t know where it comes from to prevent spreading false information. For more information on our fact-checking process, visit https://211check.org/ or send us a WhatsApp message at +211 917 298 255 to present a claim. Our team will fact-check it and respond promptly. #FactsMatter

Fact-check: These images are not of a protest in Nairobi, Kenya

It is false that the pictures shared on Sixty 4 Tribes Press are about a protest in Kenya which allegedly destroyed a vehicle belonging to the South Sudan Embassy in Nairobi.

Writer: Beatrice Amude Paulino

Sixty 4 Tribes Press, a controversial Facebook page, posted a report on March 20, 2023, that protestors in Kenya had badly shattered a South Sudan embassy vehicle in Nairobi.

A South Sudan embassy vehicle in Nairobi has been badly shattered by protesters as protests heightened in the Kenya capital,” the post reads.

The Sixty 4 Tribes Press, a Facebook page with over 57,000 followers, has been in the limelight for sharing hate speech and misinformation-related content.

However, the claim is false because according to Google Lens searches here, here, and here, the pictures shared and posted were used on different pages, years and in different countries and not from a recent incident in Kenya. 

A screenshot of Sixty 4 Tribes Press claims that the images are from Kenya

The picture was used on August, 23,2016 in Mamelodi, South Africa, on the  Pretoria News Facebook page

It was taken near the Heatherly Cemetery in Mamelodi East, following fracas over a housing controversy, and credited to Oupa Mokoena of Pretoria News. Police were forced to use a stun grenade to disperse the crowd, sending people running for cover.

A picture on Twitter(@omwambaKE) showing a particular live scene from Nairobi Central Business District (CBD) 

Conclusion:

211 Check finds the claim that protestors have destroyed a South Sudan embassy vehicle in Nairobi, Kenya false

The pictures were randomly collected from the internet to fabricate a story which has not occurred anywhere in Nairobi, Kenya in the wake of the announcement of the Pro Raila protest.

Fight misinformation in mainstream and alternative media by not being a victim of fake news. Refrain from sharing content you are unsure about or don’t know where it comes from to prevent spreading false information. For more information on our fact-checking process, visit https://211check.org/ or send us a WhatsApp message at +211 917 298 255 to present a claim. Our team will fact-check it and respond promptly. #FactsMatter

Fact-check: No, the Government of South Sudan is not giving free loans

A viral social media post claiming that the government of South Sudan is giving its people free loans is a scam.

Writer: Jibi Moses 

A post making viral appearances on social media, mainly Facebook and WhatsApp, claiming that the government of South Sudan is giving its people free loans is false.

A Facebook page, PlusAtlas FTW, first shared the post on the 7th of March, 2023, with a caption, “Did you know you could be favoured with a government loan for your business or home? See options here…”

The post, which is a sponsored Facebook ad, has attracted over 180 reactions, 40 comments and four shares. It had mixed reactions from the public as some people doubted its authenticity while others showed interest in how to access these government loans. 

A screenshot of the post from the Facebook page.

Investigation:

Due to the suspicion raised from the post and the comments given by most people, 211 Check had to make a thorough investigation into it.

However, clicking the links provided on the post will direct one to a page with a small heading reading Related searches. Money, Government credits to start a business, Grants for small businesses, money Help and Loans for small companies.

The above websites are all unrelated and have different content, much as they appear genuine and for well-established companies, for example, Brookfield and Standard Chartered Bank Vuka. 

They claim to offer services ranging from banking, housing and other investments. Yet, these entities are neither established in South Sudan nor working in conjunction with the government of South Sudan in any way.

A Google search for free government loans in South Sudan returns no results. And finally, they are not giving out free loans either in the other parts of the world or in South Sudan.

The Bank of South Sudan, the central bank that regulates financial entities in the country, has no information about the said loan.

Screenshot of the whois analysis of Vuka.co.ke

One of the companies that you will be directed to when you click on the money tab. Vuka is a Kenyan company.

Conclusion:

The claim that the government of South Sudan is giving its people free loans, as made in a viral post on social media, is false. 

211 Check finds that the links provided on the post direct users to unrelated websites with different content, and a Google search for free government loans in South Sudan yielded no results. The central bank of South Sudan, which regulates financial entities in the country, has no information about such a loan.

Fight misinformation in mainstream and alternative media by not being a victim of fake news. Refrain from sharing content you are unsure about or don’t know where it comes from to prevent spreading false information. For more information on our fact-checking process, visit https://211check.org/ or send us a WhatsApp message at +211 917 298 255 to present a claim. Our team will fact-check it and respond promptly. #FactsMatter

Fact-check: This man with dog meat was not arrested at Gudele One

Much as the man pictured while handcuffed was with what seems to be dog meat, he wasn’t arrested in South Sudan’s capital Juba, along Gudele Street.

Writer: Jibi Moses

A Facebook page in the name of Atar News made a viral post with a picture of a man alongside meat and in handcuffs, but the claim is false.

The page claimed the man in the picture shared had been selling dog meat along Gudele Street in Juba city for about a year. “A businessman was caught slaughtering dogs in Gudele One. The man was a roasted meat seller along Juba – Gudele road,” the post partly reads.

The post attracted over 30 reactions, ten comments and eight shares in less than a day.

A screenshot of the post made by Atar News

Investigation:

On running a reverse image search on Bing and Google, several results showed that the same picture was used in  Uganda with the same claims of dog meat selling attached. Here are some links used on Twitter (1, 2, 3) and YouTube videos.

We could not find credible media sources reporting on this alleged incident in South Sudan. Therefore, it is important to approach this claim with scepticism until further evidence supports its veracity.

Conclusion: 

The above picture was neither taken on Gudele Street nor in South Sudan. This misinformation can cause mistrust in the population about people who sell meat, especially those selling roasted meat alongside the ways. 

Fight misinformation in mainstream and alternative media by not being a victim of fake news. Refrain from sharing content you are unsure about or don’t know where it comes from to prevent spreading false information. For more information on our fact-checking process, visit https://211check.org/ or send us a WhatsApp message at +211 917 298 255 to present a claim. Our team will fact-check it and respond promptly. #FactsMatter

Fact-check: A massive figure sightings over Juba and Rumbek proven false

Claims that a massive figure was seen in the sky above Juba or Rumbek in South Sudan are false, as a reverse image search shows that the image was actually taken in Zambia in 2017.

Writer: Emmanuel Bida Thomas

Social media has been abuzz with claims that a massive figure resembling the evil ‘dementors’ from the Harry Potter series was seen in the sky above Juba, South Sudan or Rumbek, a town in South Sudan’s Lakes State. 

The image was shared by several Facebook users here, here, here, and here.

Facebook post claiming that the image is from Rumbek.

However, a reverse image search shows that this is not the case. The image has actually been circulating on social media since March 2017, and reports suggest that it was taken above the Mukuba Mall in the city of Kitwe in north-central Zambia.

Reported by the Uk’s The Sun, Daily Star, FZN, and Yahoo News.

The claims that the image is from South Sudan are entirely unfounded. The image has been debunked multiple times since it first appeared in 2017, and it has been widely reported that it was taken in Zambia.

It is important to note that social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter can be hotbeds of misinformation and fake news, especially during times of crisis or uncertainty. Verifying any claims before sharing them with others is crucial in such situations. One way to do this is by conducting a reverse image search, which can quickly reveal an image’s original source and help debunk any false claims.

In this case, a reverse image search shows that the image in question is not from South Sudan, but rather from Zambia. It is not uncommon for images to be misattributed or taken out of context on social media, so it is important to be vigilant when sharing information online.

Conclusion:

Claims that a massive figure resembling a ‘dementor’ from the Harry Potter series was seen in the sky above Juba or Rumbek in South Sudan are false. The image has been circulating on social media since 2017, and it was actually taken above the Mukuba Mall in Kitwe, Zambia.

Fight misinformation on mainstream and alternative media by not being a victim of fake news. Refrain from sharing content you are unsure about or don’t know where it comes from to prevent spreading false information. For more information on our fact-checking process, visit https://211check.org/ or send us a WhatsApp message at +211 917 298 255 to present a claim. Our team will fact-check it and respond promptly. #FactsMatter

Fact-check: Is Ecobank offering 100,000 pounds for free? No, it is a scam and should not be interacted with

Writer: Ochaya Jackson

A claim that has been making the rounds on WhatsApp groups that Ecobank’s National Government Subsidies campaign is offering internet users the chance to win up to 100,000 South Sudanese Pounds (SSP) after correctly answering four questions, is a hoax.

Do you know Ecobank?” one of the questions asks. “What age are you?” “What are your thoughts on Ecobank?” “Also, are you male or female?”

Despite being warned that the link is a phishing scam, several users have continued to share it in WhatsApp groups and with their contacts. This is a phishing scam, in which people pose as trustworthy companies or organizations in order to obtain personal information from victims.

Screenshot of the unrelated site’s homepage

After answering all of the questions, one is supposedly eligible to win prizes, but it then instructs people to share with five groups or twenty WhatsApp friends as conditions before claiming the prize, which is supposed to arrive within five to seven days, according to the claim.

Screenshot of a congratulatory message on the site

These links, however, are phishing scams. An investigation by 211 Check discovered that the claim is a scam from an entity or individual who is not the real Ecobank Group, and you should not click or interact with them.

A search on Google and the Ecobank Group website for National Government Subsidies yielded the result “No match found.”

Screenshot showing search results for “Ecobank National Government Subsidies”

According to publicly available information on the Ecobank Group’s website, the website where the claim about the Ecobank offer is posted does not match with the true website features of the Ecobank Group. The official Ecobank website is: https://ecobank.com/

The same offer has also not been shared on the social media accounts for Ecobank on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter or LinkedIn.

211 Check also used Virustotal to examine the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) and discovered that the URL link of the claim is flagged as dangerous by five security vendors (BitDefender, G-Data, Webroot, Fortinet, and Kaspersky) as malicious [malicious, malware, and for phishing].

Screenshot of the analysis by virus total

Whois Record of the phising link versus Ecobank website:

The Ecobank domain was registered in January 1998, while the phishing link was registered in July 2022. It is always a red flag when a site was created around the time it went viral.

Screenshot showing domain information for Ecobank

Screenshot showing domain information for the phishing website

Conclusion:

211 Check concludes that there is no offer of such kind going on with the Ecobank Group.

The links being shared are scams. You should not click or interact with them. This sort of scam is called a phishing scam, which is where people pretend to be trustworthy companies or organisations in order to get personal information from victims.

Criminals use publicly available information about you online (including social media sites) to make their phishing messages more convincing.

You can reduce your chances of being phished by considering what personal information you (and others) post about yourself, as well as reviewing your privacy settings on your social media accounts.

Recognising a scam

It might be a scam if:

  • it seems too good to be true – for example, a holiday that’s much cheaper than you’d expect 
  • someone you don’t know contacts you unexpectedly
  • you suspect you’re not dealing with a real company – for example, if there’s no postal address
  • you’ve been asked to transfer money quickly
  • you’ve been asked to pay in an unusual way – for example, by Mobile Money or through a transfer service like MoneyGram or Western Union
  • you’ve been asked to give away personal information like passwords or PINs
  • you haven’t had written confirmation of what’s been agreed

Fact-check: Money impounded from a minister’s wife in Khartoum, Sudan? No, it is an old video

The video footage is from an unrelated event in December 2021.

Writer: Emmanuel Bida

According to video footage circulating on social media and first published by a Facebook user, the wife of a South Sudanese minister was apprehended at Khartoum International Airport with millions of dollars in UN boxes today. This is false because it is an old video.

The post received over 100 interactions, including more than 50 shares and several comments.

It is not surprising that the Minister’s wife was caught red-handed officially by Sudan Intelligence Security Agencies traveling from South Sudan with millions of dollars in boxes and has been arrested at the Khartoum International Airport (KIA) in Sudan with about $ 20 million USD in boxes marked UN,” partly reads the post that was re-shared by African press and Juba South Sudan, Facebook pages that are known for sharing false and misleading content recently.

Some social media users also shared the same video with the claim here and here.

Screenshot of the false video footage

The video, however, is quite old. A Facebook search returns versions of the same video from December 2021, claiming that $300 million in smuggled money from Sudan to South Sudan was seized at Juba International Airport. It was also used in connection with an allegation that more than $300 million USD was confiscated at Juba International Airport in December 2021.

Conclusion:

A claim that money was impounded from a minister’s wife in Khartoum, Sudan, is found to be false by 211 Check. The video is from a separate event in December 2021.

SCAM ALERT Fake UNICEF South Sudan Job Offers

SCAM ALERT: These UNICEF South Sudan Career Opportunities are Fake

The UNICEF South Sudan Communications Officer has told 211 Check that the recruitment for vacant positions allegedly by the organisation is fake, and no one should recognize it because they don’t receive job applications via email.

By Emmanuel Bida Thomas

A job posting purportedly from UNICEF South Sudan has been making the rounds on social media, advertising over 8,000 jobs in a variety of departments ranging from interns to administrators in all ten states of South Sudan.

Interested Applicants are asked to send their cover letter, CV, and National ID to an unrelated Web email, but the job advertisement bears all of the hallmarks of a scam, as have many others exposed by 211 Check.

Image of the Fake Job Advertisement

The job listings are on an image rather than the official website  of UNICEF South Sudan that is supposedly hiring. Such documents are quick and easy to set up and look official. 

The email is designed to look as though it is an official UNICEF South Sudan email, but is a free Gmail email – @gmail.com. Official UNICEF email ends in – unicef.org. 

When 211 Check contacted the UNICEF South Sudan communications office, its Communication Officer, Richard Ruati said that the recruitment for vacant positions allegedly by UNICEF South Sudan is fake, and no one should recognize it because the organisation doesn’t receive job applications via email.

We have noticed the unfortunate job adverts purported in the name of UNICEF. Please note that these adverts, emails and slogans are fake, and no one should recognize them. UNICEF releases job adverts only on https://jobs.unicef.org/en-us/, and we don’t receive job adverts through emails,” Richard Ruati wrote in an email reply to 211 Check.

When you see a job advertised on Social Media, avoid providing personal information such as your National ID or Phone Number through unofficial emails or websites, and ensure that the link provided (if any) takes you to the organization’s official website.

To avoid becoming a victim of a job scam, use the SCAM CHECK or read what the UN Careers has to say about job SCAMS.

Conclusion:

211 Check has looked into jobs advertised in the name of UNICEF South Sudan — and finds them to be a SCAM

To know more about our fact-checking process, visit:  https://211check.org/how-to-fact-check/ or send us a WhatsApp Message at +211 917 298 255 to present a claim, our team will immediately fact-check it and send you a feedback.

Do Covid-19 Vaccines Cause Female Infertility?

By Charles Lotara

On 30th September 2021, the government of South Sudan completed the inoculation of the second consignment of the COVID-19 AstraZeneca vaccine. Out of the 59,520 doses, 59,224 were used while 296 expired according to Mabior Kiir Kudior, the Chief of Planning and Information at the Ministry of Health.

However, the government says the rate of turn up for the vaccine was alarmingly low among women. Of the total population vaccinated so far, women account for only 26.4 percent as compared to 73.6 rate among their male counterparts.

The reluctance by women to take the jab was attributed to claims that COVID-19 vaccine causes infertility and that this particular side effect was more adverse in females as the vaccine complicates the reproductive system.

“There are continued misconceptions and myths surrounding COVID-19 and our people don’t adhere to the vaccine and also people do not have the willingness to take the vaccine,” Mabior Kiir Kudior lamented in an interview with The City Review.

Infertility myth

The claim that COVID-19 vaccines breed infertility started in December 2020 after a German epidemiologist said the vaccines might make women’s bodies resistant to protein that is connected to placenta, and hence, making women infertile.

His thought was based on the perspective that the genetic code of the placenta protein, called syncytin-1, shares a hint of similarity with the genetic code of the spike protein in COVID-19. If the vaccines caused our bodies to make antibodies to protect us from COVID-19, he thought, they could also make antibodies to reject the placenta.

However, D’Angela Pitts, a maternal medicine specialist at America-based Henry Ford Health System dismissed the claim calling it “inaccurate”.

It’s inaccurate to say that COVID-19’s spike protein and this placenta protein share a similar genetic code. The proteins are not similar enough to cause placenta to not attach to an embryo,” she said.

The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention also disproved the claim. CDC says “COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for everyone 12 years of age and older, including people who are trying to get pregnant now or might become pregnant in the future, as well as their partners.”

No reports on COVID-19-induced infertility

According to the South Sudan Ministry of Health, there have been and are still no reports of women who reported an incident of failed pregnancy after getting vaccinated for the coronavirus.

On 15th September 2021, Dr. Victoria Anib Majur, Undersecretary at the Ministry of Health, appealed to women to turn up for inoculation assuring them that both Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines are safe.

I want to make a call to women out there that Johnson and Johnson and AstraZeneca are safe and effective vaccines against COVID-19 prevention. I want to encourage you not to listen to rumors out there that the vaccines cause infertility; the vaccines do not cause infertility,” Anib told 211 Check.

Conclusion:

We rate the claim that the COVID-19 vaccine causes female infertility as FALSE because it is not supported by our research. Experts say getting the COVID-19 vaccine doesn’t trigger an immune response leading to female infertility.

To know more about our fact-checking process, visit:  https://211check.org/how-to-fact-check/ or send us a WhatsApp Message at +211 917 298 255 to present a claim, our team will immediately fact-check it and send you a feedback.